a5c7b9f00b Sometime in the future, the polar ice caps have melted and the world's oceans and seas have covered the land. People are few and far between, living in small communities at sea or sailing from one to another as traders. All the people seek dry land.. something nobody has seen. The world is flooded. Civilisation is lost under the sea. The Mariner sails his trimoran over the seas, drinking his own Urine and visits a floating atoll of "Drifters". When they find the Mariner to be a mutant they sentence him to death. Meanwhile, a girl with supposedly a map to get to dry land tattoo-ed on her back, is the objective for an attack by a gang of smokers who attack the atoll. In a future where the polar ice caps have melted, flooding the Earth, the mariner (Kevin Costner)—part man, part fish—reluctantly befriends a beautiful woman, Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn), and a young girl, Enola (Tina Majorino), whose mysterious back tattoo holds the secret to the whereabouts of dry land. Meanwhile, a band of vicious pirates, led by the wicked Deacon (Dennis Hopper), try to find Enola in order to claim dry land for themselves.<br/><br/>One of the biggest box office failures of the '90s, Waterworld is, in many ways, more than worthy of the derision thrown its way: it's overlong; the plot is beyond ludicrous, raising numerous questions that are never answered; Dennis Hopper's villain is way too cartoonish; and the set pieces are stunt-packed and explosive but lack genuine excitement. What the film does have, however, is a great sense of fun, wonderful production design and excellent cinematography, all of which go to make this a lot more enjoyable than its reputation suggests.<br/><br/>$175 million well spent? Of course not, but this 'Mad Max on water' adventure is worth catching, if only just the once. Yes I actually sat through this entire film and I can confidently say that it is bad -- very bad. Picture _The Road Warrior_ with a vast ocean wasteland instead of a vast dry wasteland. Then throw in the futuristic love story, as well as the leading man, of _The Postman_ and you can pretty much predict this entire movie. It's an adventure story mixed with sci-fi mixed with the cheesy romance that is all too common in films featuring Mr. Costner and it is not done convincingly. There is a hero, a woman, and a girl, evil gangs, lovable comrades, cheesy comic relief and a storybook ending. Just change the character names, the place names and the setting, throw it all into the formula and you get standard Hollywood drudge. And they wonder why no one goes to movies anymore. It's really not bad... It's a genuine vault at greatness that misses the mark -- but survives. The movie was heavily cut for the Theatrical Version. Several years later, the American network ABC aired a reconstructed Extended Version that ran more than 43 minutes longer than the original theatrical version, featuring scenes that were cut prior to the movie's theatrical release. Later on this version was released on DVD as well. In short... no.<br/><br/>Much of the melting would make no difference at all to sea levels. This is because a lot of the ice in the arctic and antarctic is sea ice (ice floats and the icebergs are floating on water). Most of this is already below the waterline - and the only reason a small percentage of an iceberg sticks out of the water is that ice is a bit less dense than water. As it melted the berg would submerge completely, but the ice would also shrink by the same amount as it turned back into water. So the overall effect on the oceans would be zero, or at least very close to it.<br/><br/>What would matter is the ice that is on land melting and that extra water running into the oceans. We don't have a perfect number for how much of this ice there is, but we do know it is reasonably close, and if all the ice on land melted it would raise sea levels by around 400 feet.<br/><br/>Given that most of the world's population lives within 400 feet of sea level this would certainly be a global catastrophe of unprecedented scale. But it would cover only a small fraction of the total surface. It is shown in a deleted scene that the Dry land they find at the end of the film is the top thousand feet or so of Mount Everest, which would indeed be the last place to flood if the ocean could rise that far. But in reality, a 400 foot sea level rise would leave the world with almost as much dry land as it has today, in percentage terms.<br/><br/>To give an example of how far the movie is from reality, consider that it shows the Mariner diving thousands of feet down to explore the sunken city of Denver. In reality a 400 foot sea level rise would leave Denver still almost a mile above sea level, and more than 1,000 miles inland from the coast.
Waterworld Full Movie In Hindi Free Download Mp4
Updated: Mar 29, 2020